| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Epagri-Sede. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblio@epagri.sc.gov.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Epagri-Sede. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/06/2003 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/06/2003 |
|
Autoria: |
RIZZARDI, M. A.; PALUDO, G. L. |
|
Título: |
Influencia do arranjo de plantas na antecipacao da colheita do Girassol. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1994 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ciencia Rural, Santa Maria, v.24, n. 1, p. 81-86, jan./abr. 1994. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Colheita; Diametro de capitulo; Girassol; Unidade de fraos. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00496naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1025165
005 2003-06-06
008 1994 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aRIZZARDI, M. A.
245 $aInfluencia do arranjo de plantas na antecipacao da colheita do Girassol.
260 $c1994
653 $aColheita
653 $aDiametro de capitulo
653 $aGirassol
653 $aUnidade de fraos
700 1 $aPALUDO, G. L.
773 $tCiencia Rural, Santa Maria$gv.24, n. 1, p. 81-86, jan./abr. 1994.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Epagri-Sede (Epagri-Sede) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
|
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Epagri-Sede. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/01/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/01/2012 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
-- - -- |
|
Autoria: |
CONCENÇO, G.; SILVA, A.; FERREIRA, E.; GALON, L.; NOLDIN, J. A.; ASPIAZÚ, I.; FERREIRA, F.; SILVA, A. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
Epagri |
|
Título: |
Effect of dose and application site on quinclorac absorption by barnyardgrass biotypes. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Planta Daninha, Viçosa, v. 27, n. 3, p. 541-548, 2009. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
ISSN, 0100-8358 |
|
Conteúdo: |
This work aimed to evaluate the uptake and translocation of quinclorac in function of application sites (shoot or roots) by Echinochloa crusgalli biotypes resistant and susceptible to this herbicide. The treatments consisted of quinclorac doses (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4; 16 and 64 ppm), applied on the shoot or roots of seedlings of barnyardgrass biotypes. The experimental units consisted of plastic cups containing 250 cm3 of sand. The treatments were applied 10 days after emergence, when barnyardgrass plants reached a 2- to 3- leaf growth stage. The barnyardgrass biotypes were irrigated with nutritive solution weekly and maintained for 40 days after emergence, when length, fresh and dry matter of shoot and roots were evaluated. Variance analysis was carried out using the F test at 5% probability, and in case of significance, a non-linear regression analysis was also carried out using a three-parameter logistic model. In the susceptible biotype, quinclorac was more absorbed by the roots than by the shoot. Comparing dry mass production of the different plant parts of the susceptible biotype per application site, it was verified that quinclorac action is higher when applied to the plant roots. However, for the resistant biotype, it was not possible to determine the dose causing 50% reduction in dry mass accumulation (GR50) and in the resistance index (RI) between both biotypes, due to its high resistance to quinclorac (128 times the recommended dosage). The results showed that quinclorac resistance by the evaluated biotype is not due to differences in the absorption site, strongly suggesting that the resistance acquired by the biotype may result from alteration in the target site. MenosThis work aimed to evaluate the uptake and translocation of quinclorac in function of application sites (shoot or roots) by Echinochloa crusgalli biotypes resistant and susceptible to this herbicide. The treatments consisted of quinclorac doses (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4; 16 and 64 ppm), applied on the shoot or roots of seedlings of barnyardgrass biotypes. The experimental units consisted of plastic cups containing 250 cm3 of sand. The treatments were applied 10 days after emergence, when barnyardgrass plants reached a 2- to 3- leaf growth stage. The barnyardgrass biotypes were irrigated with nutritive solution weekly and maintained for 40 days after emergence, when length, fresh and dry matter of shoot and roots were evaluated. Variance analysis was carried out using the F test at 5% probability, and in case of significance, a non-linear regression analysis was also carried out using a three-parameter logistic model. In the susceptible biotype, quinclorac was more absorbed by the roots than by the shoot. Comparing dry mass production of the different plant parts of the susceptible biotype per application site, it was verified that quinclorac action is higher when applied to the plant roots. However, for the resistant biotype, it was not possible to determine the dose causing 50% reduction in dry mass accumulation (GR50) and in the resistance index (RI) between both biotypes, due to its high resistance to quinclorac (128 times the recommended dosage). The results showed that quinclora... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Echinochloa crusgalli; Herbicide; Resistance mechanism. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
|
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02189naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1082850
005 2012-01-06
008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aEpagri
245 $aEffect of dose and application site on quinclorac absorption by barnyardgrass biotypes.
260 $c2009
500 $aISSN, 0100-8358
520 $aThis work aimed to evaluate the uptake and translocation of quinclorac in function of application sites (shoot or roots) by Echinochloa crusgalli biotypes resistant and susceptible to this herbicide. The treatments consisted of quinclorac doses (0; 0.5; 1; 2; 4; 16 and 64 ppm), applied on the shoot or roots of seedlings of barnyardgrass biotypes. The experimental units consisted of plastic cups containing 250 cm3 of sand. The treatments were applied 10 days after emergence, when barnyardgrass plants reached a 2- to 3- leaf growth stage. The barnyardgrass biotypes were irrigated with nutritive solution weekly and maintained for 40 days after emergence, when length, fresh and dry matter of shoot and roots were evaluated. Variance analysis was carried out using the F test at 5% probability, and in case of significance, a non-linear regression analysis was also carried out using a three-parameter logistic model. In the susceptible biotype, quinclorac was more absorbed by the roots than by the shoot. Comparing dry mass production of the different plant parts of the susceptible biotype per application site, it was verified that quinclorac action is higher when applied to the plant roots. However, for the resistant biotype, it was not possible to determine the dose causing 50% reduction in dry mass accumulation (GR50) and in the resistance index (RI) between both biotypes, due to its high resistance to quinclorac (128 times the recommended dosage). The results showed that quinclorac resistance by the evaluated biotype is not due to differences in the absorption site, strongly suggesting that the resistance acquired by the biotype may result from alteration in the target site.
653 $aEchinochloa crusgalli
653 $aHerbicide
653 $aResistance mechanism
773 $tPlanta Daninha, Viçosa$gv. 27, n. 3, p. 541-548, 2009.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Epagri-Sede (Epagri-Sede) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
